Skip to main content

Hesperian

Multi tool use
Multi tool use







Hesperian


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to navigation
Jump to search


This article is about the Mars geologic system and time period. For other senses, see Hesperia.




MOLA colorized relief map of Hesperia Planum, the type area for the Hesperian System. Note that Hesperia Planum has fewer large impact craters than the surrounding Noachian terrain, indicating a younger age. Colors indicate elevation, with red highest, yellow intermediate, and green/blue lowest.


The Hesperian is a geologic system and time period on the planet Mars characterized by widespread volcanic activity and catastrophic flooding that carved immense outflow channels across the surface. The Hesperian is an intermediate and transitional period of Martian history. During the Hesperian, Mars changed from the wetter and perhaps warmer world of the Noachian to the dry, cold, and dusty planet seen today.[1] The absolute age of the Hesperian Period is uncertain. The beginning of the period followed the end of the late heavy bombardment[2] and probably corresponds to the start of the lunar Late Imbrian period,[3][4] around 3700 million years ago (Mya). The end of the Hesperian Period is much more uncertain and could range anywhere from 3200 to 2000 Mya,[5] with 3000 Mya being frequently cited. The Hesperian Period is roughly coincident with the Earth’s early Archean Eon.[2]


With the decline of heavy impacts at the end of the Noachian, volcanism became the primary geologic process on Mars, producing vast plains of flood basalts and broad volcanic constructs (highland paterae).[6] By Hesperian times, all of the large shield volcanoes on Mars, including Olympus Mons, had begun to form.[7] Volcanic outgassing released large amounts of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) into the atmosphere, causing a transition in the style of weathering from dominantly phyllosilicate (clay) to sulfate mineralogy.[8] Liquid water became more localized in extent and turned more acidic as it interacted with SO2 and H2S to form sulfuric acid.[9][10]


By the beginning of the Late Hesperian the atmosphere had probably thinned to its present density.[10] As the planet cooled, groundwater stored in the upper crust (megaregolith) began to freeze, forming a thick cryosphere overlying a deeper zone of liquid water.[11] Subsequent volcanic or tectonic activity occasionally fractured the cryosphere, releasing enormous quantities of deep groundwater to the surface and carving huge outflow channels. Much of this water flowed into the northern hemisphere where it probably pooled to form large transient lakes or an ice covered ocean.




Contents





  • 1 Description and name origin


  • 2 Hesperian chronology and stratigraphy

    • 2.1 System vs. period


    • 2.2 Boundaries and subdivisions



  • 3 Mars during the Hesperian Period

    • 3.1 Impact Cratering



  • 4 Notes and references


  • 5 Bibliography and recommended reading




Description and name origin[edit]


The Hesperian System and Period is named after Hesperia Planum, a moderately cratered highland region northeast of the Hellas basin. The type area of the Hesperian System is in the Mare Tyrrhenum quadrangle (MC-22) around 20°S 245°W / 20°S 245°W / -20; -245. The region consists of rolling, wind-streaked plains with abundant wrinkle ridges resembling those on the lunar maria. These "ridged plains" are interpreted to be basaltic lava flows (flood basalts) that erupted from fissures.[12] The number-density of large impact craters is moderate, with about 125-200 craters greater than 5 km in diameter per million km2.[13][14] Hesperian-aged ridged plains cover roughly 30% of the Martian surface;[2] they are most prominent in Hesperia Planum, Syrtis Major Planum, Lunae Planum, Malea Planum, and the Syria-Solis-Sinai Plana in southernTharsis.[15][16]



NoachianNoachianAmazonian (Mars)
Martian Time Periods (Millions of Years Ago)


Hesperian chronology and stratigraphy[edit]




Schematic cross section of image at left. Surface units are interpreted as a sequence of layers (strata), with the youngest at top and oldest at bottom in accordance with the law of superposition.





HiRISE image illustrating superpositioning, a principle that lets geologists determine the relative ages of surface units. The dark-toned lava flow overlies (is younger than) the light-toned, more heavily cratered terrain at right. The ejecta of the crater at center overlies both units, indicating that the crater is the youngest feature in the image. (See cross section, above right.)


Martian time periods are based on geologic mapping of surface units from spacecraft images.[12][17] A surface unit is a terrain with a distinct texture, color, albedo, spectral property, or set of landforms that distinguish it from other surface units and is large enough to be shown on a map.[18] Mappers use a stratigraphic approach pioneered in the early 1960s for photogeologic studies of the Moon.[19] Although based on surface characteristics, a surface unit is not the surface itself or group of landforms. It is an inferred geologic unit (e.g., formation) representing a sheetlike, wedgelike, or tabular body of rock that underlies the surface.[20][21] A surface unit may be a crater ejecta deposit, lava flow, or any surface that can be represented in three dimensions as a discrete stratum bound above or below by adjacent units (illustrated right). Using principles such as superpositioning (illustrated left), cross-cutting relationships, and the relationship of impact crater density to age, geologists can place the units into a relative age sequence from oldest to youngest. Units of similar age are grouped globally into larger, time-stratigraphic (chronostratigraphic) units, called systems. For Mars, three systems are defined: the Noachian, Hesperian, and Amazonian. Geologic units lying below (older than) the Noachian are informally designated Pre-Noachian.[22] The geologic time (geochronologic) equivalent of the Hesperian System is the Hesperian Period. Rock or surface units of the Hesperian System were formed or deposited during the Hesperian Period.



System vs. period[edit]
























e  h
Units in Earth geochronology and stratigraphy[23]
Segments of rock (strata) in chronostratigraphy
Periods of time in geochronology
Notes (Mars)
EonothemEonnot used for Mars
ErathemEranot used for Mars
SystemPeriod3 total; 108 to 109 years in length
SeriesEpoch8 total; 107 to 108 years in length
StageAgenot used for Mars
ChronozoneChronsmaller than an age/stage; not used by the ICS timescale

System and period are not interchangeable terms in formal stratigraphic nomenclature, although they are frequently confused in popular literature. A system is an idealized stratigraphic column based on the physical rock record of a type area (type section) correlated with rocks sections from many different locations planetwide.[24] A system is bound above and below by strata with distinctly different characteristics (on Earth, usually index fossils) that indicate dramatic (often abrupt) changes in the dominant fauna or environmental conditions. (See Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary as example.)


At any location, rock sections in a given system are apt to contain gaps (unconformities) analogous to missing pages from a book. In some places, rocks from the system are absent entirely due to nondeposition or later erosion. For example, rocks of the Cretaceous System are absent throughout much of the eastern central interior of the United States. However, the time interval of the Cretaceous (Cretaceous Period) still occurred there. Thus, a geologic period represents the time interval over which the strata of a system were deposited, including any unknown amounts of time present in gaps.[24] Periods are measured in years, determined by radioactive dating. On Mars, radiometric ages are not available except from Martian meteorites whose provenance and stratigraphic context are unknown. Instead, absolute ages on Mars are determined by impact crater density, which is heavily dependent upon models of crater formation over time.[25] Accordingly, the beginning and end dates for Martian periods are uncertain, especially for the Hesperian/Amazonian boundary, which may be in error by a factor of 2 or 3.[4][22]



Boundaries and subdivisions[edit]




Geologic contact of Noachian and Hesperian Systems. Hesperian ridged plains (Hr) embay and overlie older Noachian cratered plateau materials (Npl). Note that the ridged plains partially bury many of the old Noachian-aged craters. Image is THEMIS IR mosaic, based on similar Viking photo shown in Tanaka et al. (1992), Fig. 1a, p. 352.




Approximate geologic contact of Upper Hesperian lava apron from Alba Mons (Hal) with Lower Amazonian Vastitas Borealis Formation (Avb). Image is MOLA topographic map adapted from Ivanov and Head (2006), Figs. 1, 3, and 8.[26]


The lower boundary of the Hesperian System is defined as the base of the ridged plains, which are typified by Hesperia Planum and cover about a third of the planet’s surface.[3] In eastern Hesperia Planum, the ridged plains overlie early to mid Noachian aged cratered plateau materials (pictured left).[16] The Hesperian’s upper boundary is more complex and has been redefined several times based on increasingly detailed geologic mapping.[3][12][27] Currently, the stratigraphic boundary of the Hesperian with the younger Amazonian System is defined as the base of the Vastitas Borealis Formation[28] (pictured right). The Vastitas Borealis is a vast, low-lying plain that covers much of the northern hemisphere of Mars. It is generally interpreted to consist of reworked sediments originating from the Late Hesperian outflow channels and may be the remnant of an ocean that covered the northern lowland basins. Another interpretation of the Vastitas Borealis Formation is that it consists of lava flows.[29]


The Hesperian System is subdivided into two chronostratigraphic series: Lower Hesperian and Upper Hesperian. The series are based on referents or locations on the planet where surface units indicate a distinctive geological episode, recognizable in time by cratering age and stratigraphic position. For example, Hesperia Planum is the referent location for the Lower Hesperian Series.[3][30] The corresponding geologic time (geochronological) units of the two Hesperian series are the Early Hesperian and Late Hesperian Epochs. Note that an epoch is a subdivision of a period; the two terms are not synonymous in formal stratigraphy. The age of the Early Hepserian/Late Hesperian boundary is uncertain, ranging from 3600 to 3200 million years ago based on crater counts.[5] The average of the range is shown in the timeline below.





Hesperian Epochs (Millions of Years Ago)[5]

Stratigraphic terms are typically confusing to geologists and non-geologists alike. One way to sort through the difficulty is by the following example: One could easily go to Cincinnati, Ohio and visit a rock outcrop in the Upper Ordovician Series of the Ordovician System. You could even collect a fossil trilobite there. However, you could not visit the Late Ordovician Epoch in the Ordovician Period and collect an actual trilobite (unless you have a time machine).


The Earth-based scheme of rigid stratigraphic nomenclature has been successfully applied to Mars for several decades now but has numerous flaws. The scheme will no doubt become refined or replaced as more and better data become available.[31] (See mineralogical timeline below as example of alternative.) Obtaining radiometric ages on samples from identified surface units is clearly necessary for a more complete understanding of Martian chronology.[32]



Mars during the Hesperian Period[edit]





Viking orbiter view of Hesperian-aged surface in Terra Meridiani. The small impact craters date back to the Hesperian Period and appear crisp despite their great age. This image indicates that erosion on Mars has been very slow since the end of the Noachian. Image is 17 km across and based on Carr, 1996, p. 134, Fig. 6-8.[33]


The Hesperian was a time of declining rates of impact cratering, intense and widespread volcanic activity, and catastrophic flooding. Many of the major tectonic features on Mars formed at this time. The weight of the immense Tharsis Bulge stressed the crust to produce a vast network of extensional fractures (fossae) and compressive deformational features (wrinkle ridges) throughout the western hemisphere. The huge equatorial canyon system of Valles Marineris formed during the Hesperian as a result of these stresses. Sulfuric-acid weathering at the surface produced an abundance of sulfate minerals that precipitated in evaporitic environments, which became widespread as the planet grew increasingly arid. The Hesperian Period was also a time when the earliest evidence of glacial activity and ice-related processes appears in the Martian geologic record.



Impact Cratering[edit]


As originally conceived, the Hesperian System referred to the oldest surfaces on Mars that postdate the end of heavy bombardment.[34] The Hesperian was thus a time period of rapidly declining impact cratering rates. However, the timing and rate of the decline are uncertain. The lunar cratering record suggests that the rate of impacts in the inner Solar System during the Noachian (4000 million years ago) was 500 times higher than today.[35] Planetary scientists still debate whether these high rates represent the tail end of planetary accretion or a late cataclysmic pulse that followed a more quiescent period of impact activity. Nevertheless, at the beginning of the Hesperian, the impact rate had probably declined to about 80 times greater than present rates,[4] and by the end of the Hesperian, some 700 million years later, the rate began to resemble that seen today.[36]




Notes and references[edit]




  1. ^ Hartmann, 2003, pp. 33-34.


  2. ^ abc Carr, M.H.; Head, J.W. (2010). Geologic History of Mars. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 294, 185–203.


  3. ^ abcd Tanaka, K.L. (1986). The Stratigraphy of Mars. J. Geophys. Res., Seventeenth Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Part 1, 91(B13), E139–E158, doi:10.1029/JB091iB13p0E139. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1986LPSC...17..139T.


  4. ^ abc Hartmann, W.K.; Neukum, G. (2001). Cratering Chronology and Evolution of Mars. In Chronology and Evolution of Mars, Kallenbach, R. et al. Eds., Space Science Reviews, 96: 105–164.


  5. ^ abc Hartmann, W.K. (2005). Martian Cratering 8: Isochron Refinement and the Chronology of Mars. Icarus, 174, 294–320.


  6. ^ Greeley, R.; Spudis, P., 1981. Volcanism on Mars. Rev. Geophys. 19, pp. 13–41.


  7. ^ Werner, S.C. (2009). The Global Martian Volcanic Evolutionary History. Icarus, 201, 44–68.


  8. ^ Bibring, J.-P. et al. (2006). Global Mineralogical and Aqueous Mars History Derived from OMEGA/Mars Express Data. Science, 312(400), doi:10.1126/science.1122659.


  9. ^ Head, J.W.; Wilson, L. (2011). The Noachian-Hesperian Transition on Mars: Geological Evidence for a Punctuated Phase of Global Volcanism as a Key Driver in Climate and Atmospheric Evolution. 42nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2011), Abstract #1214. http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2011/pdf/1214.pdf.


  10. ^ ab Barlow, N.G. (2010). What We Know about Mars from Its Impact Craters. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 122(5/6), 644–657.


  11. ^ Clifford, S.M. (1993). A Model for the Hydrologic and Climatic Behavior of Water on Mars. J. Geophys. Res., 98(E6), 10,973–11,016.


  12. ^ abc Scott, D.H.; Carr, M.H. (1978). Geologic Map of Mars. U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I-1083.


  13. ^ Strom, R.G.; Croft, S.K.; Barlow, N.G. (1992) The Martian Impact Cratering Record in Mars, H.H. Kieffer et al., Eds.; University of Arizona Press: Tucson, AZ, pp. 383–423.


  14. ^ Tanaka, K.L. (1986). The Stratigraphy of Mars. J. Geophys. Res., Seventeenth Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Part 1, 91(B13), E139–E158.


  15. ^ Scott, D.H.; Tanaka, K.L. (1986). Geologic Map of the Western Equatorial Region of Mars. U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I–1802–A.


  16. ^ ab Greeley, R.; Guest, J.E. (1987). Geologic Map of the Eastern Equatorial Region of Mars. U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I–1802–B.


  17. ^ McCord, T.M. et al. (1980). Definition and Characterization of Mars Global Surface Units: Preliminary Unit Maps. 11th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference: Houston: TX, abstract #1249, pp. 697-699. http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc1980/pdf/1249.pdf.


  18. ^ Greeley, R. (1994) Planetary Landscapes, 2nd ed.; Chapman & Hall: New York, p. 8 and Fig. 1.6.


  19. ^ See Mutch, T.A. (1970). Geology of the Moon: A Stratigraphic View; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, 324 pp. and Wilhelms, D.E. (1987). The Geologic History of the Moon, USGS Professional Paper 1348; http://ser.sese.asu.edu/GHM/ for reviews of this topic.


  20. ^ Wilhelms, D.E. (1990). Geologic Mapping in Planetary Mapping, R. Greeley, R.M. Batson, Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge UK, p. 214.


  21. ^ Tanaka, K.L.; Scott, D.H.; Greeley, R. (1992). Global Stratigraphy in Mars, H.H. Kieffer et al., Eds.; University of Arizona Press: Tucson, AZ, pp. 345–382.


  22. ^ ab Nimmo, F.; Tanaka, K. (2005). Early Crustal Evolution of Mars. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 33, 133–161.


  23. ^ International Commission on Stratigraphy. "International Stratigraphic Chart" (PDF). Retrieved 2009-09-25. 


  24. ^ ab Eicher, D.L.; McAlester, A.L. (1980). History of the Earth; Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp 143–146, ISBN 0-13-390047-9.


  25. ^ Masson, P.; Carr, M.H.; Costard, F.; Greeley, R.; Hauber, E.; Jaumann, R. (2001). Geomorphologic Evidence for Liquid Water. Space Science Reviews, 96, p. 352.


  26. ^ Ivanov, M. A.; Head, J.W. (2006). Alba Patera, Mars: Topography, Structure, and Evolution of a Unique Late Hesperian–Early Amazonian Shield Volcano. J. Geophys. Res., 111(E09003), doi:10.1029/2005JE002469.


  27. ^ Tanaka, K.L.; Skinner, J.A.; Hare, T.M. (2005). Geologic Map of the Northern Plains of Mars. Scientific Investigations Map 2888, Pamphlet; U.S. Geological Survey.


  28. ^ The Vastitas Borealis Formation is used here to include the Lower Amazonian Scandia, Vastitas Borealis interior, and Vastitas Borealis marginal units of Tanaka et al. (2005).


  29. ^ Catling, D.C.; Leovy, C.B.; Wood, S.E.; Day, M.D. (2011). A Lava Sea in the Northern Plains of Mars: Circumpolar Hesperian Oceans Reconsidered. 42nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, Abstract #2529. http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2011/pdf/2529.pdf.


  30. ^ Masson, P. (1991). The Martian Stratigraphy—Short Review and Perspectives. Space Science. Reviews., 56, 9–12.


  31. ^ Tanaka, K.L. (2001). The Stratigraphy of Mars: What We Know, Don't Know, and Need to Do. 32nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, Abstract #1695. http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2001/pdf/1695.pdf.


  32. ^ Carr, 2006, p. 41.


  33. ^ Carr, M.H. (1996). Water on Mars; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 229 pp, ISBN 0-19-509938-9.


  34. ^ Carr, 2006, p. 15.


  35. ^ Carr, 2006, p. 23.


  36. ^ Fassett, C.I.; Head, J.W. (2011). Sequence and Timing of Conditions on Early Mars. Icarus, 211, 1204–1214, doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2010.11.014.



Bibliography and recommended reading[edit]



  • Boyce, Joseph M. (2008). The Smithsonian Book of Mars. Old Saybrook, CT: Konecky & Konecky. ISBN 978-1-58834-074-0. 


  • Carr, Michael H. (2006). The Surface of Mars. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-87201-0. 


  • Hartmann, William K. (2003). A Traveler’s Guide to Mars: The Mysterious Landscapes of the Red Planet. New York: Workman. ISBN 0-7611-2606-6. 


  • Morton, Oliver (2003). Mapping Mars: Science, Imagination, and the Birth of a World. New York: Picador. ISBN 0-312-42261-X. 

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hesperian&oldid=821048474"





Navigation menu

























(window.RLQ=window.RLQ||).push(function()mw.config.set("wgPageParseReport":"limitreport":"cputime":"0.964","walltime":"1.519","ppvisitednodes":"value":1741,"limit":1000000,"ppgeneratednodes":"value":0,"limit":1500000,"postexpandincludesize":"value":64271,"limit":2097152,"templateargumentsize":"value":2324,"limit":2097152,"expansiondepth":"value":17,"limit":40,"expensivefunctioncount":"value":0,"limit":500,"unstrip-depth":"value":0,"limit":20,"unstrip-size":"value":20052,"limit":5000000,"entityaccesscount":"value":0,"limit":400,"timingprofile":["100.00% 1100.593 1 -total"," 24.68% 271.653 1 Template:Reflist"," 17.52% 192.818 4 Template:Navbox"," 12.19% 134.186 1 Template:Mars"," 7.18% 79.073 2 Template:ISBN"," 6.65% 73.223 4 Template:Cite_book"," 6.39% 70.308 1 Template:Cite_web"," 3.28% 36.077 2 Template:Catalog_lookup_link"," 3.24% 35.693 1 Template:About"," 2.29% 25.225 3 Template:Icon"],"scribunto":"limitreport-timeusage":"value":"0.216","limit":"10.000","limitreport-memusage":"value":3679393,"limit":52428800,"cachereport":"origin":"mw2165","timestamp":"20180918005051","ttl":1900800,"transientcontent":false);mw.config.set("wgBackendResponseTime":84,"wgHostname":"mw2235"););
b5rWvfW9rNaCan,l 9l,2QK5T twzEED3qS,RBOpcCacUUN48bORgXXbz
-
Zxbyt0xU,LCdFbcDxigOQ giR1D2GDETuyKsCsmrO8dQm0Ed 4WyH i

Popular posts from this blog

The Dalles, Oregon

Image
The Dalles, Oregon From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This article is about the city in Oregon. For the nearby geological formation, see Celilo Falls. For other uses, see Dalles. Not to be confused with the town of Dallas, Oregon. City in Wasco County The Dalles City The Dalles and the Columbia River in November 2008 Flag Seal Motto(s):  "Cognito timor Vincit" (Latin), "Knowledge Conquers Fear" (English) Location in Oregon Coordinates: 45°36′4″N 121°10′58″W  /  45.60111°N 121.18278°W  / 45.60111; -121.18278 Coordinates: 45°36′4″N 121°10′58″W  /  45.60111°N 121.18278°W  / 45.60111; -121.18278 County Wasco County Incorporated 1857 Government  • Mayor Stephen Elliott Lawrence (D) [1] [2] Area [3]  • Total 6.61 sq mi (17.12...
Read more

영화 미래의 미라이 다시보기 (2018) 다운로드 링크 무료보기

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP 영화 미래의 미라이 다시보기 (2018) 다운로드 링크 무료보기      클릭 링크 →  https://bit.ly/2IpD1bZ                                                                                                             (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || ).push();       영화 다운로드 2018 무료영화 ...
Read more

Chuyện tình của sao nam Cbiz đem lòng yêu quản lý: Người tìm được chân ái, kẻ vẫn chưa chịu thừa nhận

Image
Giới giải trí có không thiếu những câu chuyện cổ tích về những mối tình nghệ sĩ – người quản lý. Hầu như họ đều yêu thương nhau từ sự đồng cảm, từ thời gian, từ "lâu ngày sinh tình". Cổ Cự Cơ, Trương Chấn, Trương Vỹ đều là những người đàn ông đã yêu và kết hôn với người quản lý xinh đẹp. Trong khi Tiêu Kính Đằng vẫn úp mở còn Trương Bân Bân lại hoàn toàn phủ nhận. 1. Tiêu Kính Đằng Mới chỉ hợp tác một thời gian ngắn, Tiêu Kính Đằng và người quản lý tên Lâm Hữu Tuệ (Summer) đã vướng phải tin đồn hẹn hò. Khi đó, Summer vừa chia tay với người bạn trai xã hội đen, còn Tiêu Kính Đằng vẫn đang độc thân, cặp đôi đến với nhau vì những sự đồng cảm trong tâm hồn. Summer từng chia sẻ về nam ca sĩ họ Tiêu: "Tính cách của anh ấy vẫn luôn quan tâm người khác, có đôi khi còn có thể cùng nhau lái xe, cùng ăn một bát mỳ gói". Tiêu Kính Đằng và Lâm Hữu Tuệ (Summer). Summer hơn nam nghệ sĩ tới 13 tuổi, từng là bạn gái của một ông trùm xã hội đen Tuy chưa từng xác nhận tình cảm trước t...
Read more